AI Statement

In my experimental AI courses, students don't just thrive: they become unstoppable.

By starting with students and not the technology, paths unfold differently for AI and education. By thinking about what we owe them, though, the path becomes clear: transformation, not growth.

Since arriving at the University of Florida, I have been pioneering courses, leading international workshops, and hosting conferences on professional writing and AI. Convinced that how we consider AI has downstream implications for its use in the classroom, I launched the Journal of Writing and Artificial Intelligence to explore the future of writing. My philosophy of AI and education does not disentangle theoretical and practical fronts: conceptualization attaches to appropriate use.

The discourse surrounding AI in higher education suffers from two base complications. First, it is largely analogous (e.g., AI is the new calculator; or, it's like a microwave: good at certain things but bad at others), which, though helpful, gives rise to nebulous conceptualization and moves us away from appreciating structure and process. Second, and relatedly, the very concepts used to describe AI tend toward encampment (e.g., tools can be good or bad; or, uses can be right or wrong). While both issues lead and contribute to misunderstanding, the secondary effects therefrom can have a devastating effect on students (e.g., students become subject to policies that limit potential or party to procedures that likewise imperil futures). This need not be the case. Instead, we can conceptualize AI both in ways that attach to standards (e.g., inspiration, revision, transformation) and in ways that bypass dichotomies (e.g., situational procedures). Toward these ends, I hope to situate the conversation about AI in higher education semantically apart from its popular rhetoric by creating a new socio-cognitive grounding: AI as a model or mode for taking appropriate measures. Thus, conceptualization of AI need not be something but somehow.

In both academe and industry, AI-driven solutions are everywhere. Our obligation to prepare our students for the future must include AI. Students pursuing courses and careers in AI should develop not only capacities for programming and prompting LLMs but also skills in AI-based proposals, presentations, and visuals. Just as with computers, there will be more practitioners of AI than people innovating within AI programming. Thus, as a function of workforce readiness, we must prepare the next generation to communicate in spaces where AI-driven solutions are generated and conveyed. To these ends, I teach various writing for AI courses at UF—the AI University.

Zea Miller

Experience

Editor
Journal of Writing and Artificial Intelligence

Courses

  • Professional Writing in AI
  • The Rhetoric of AI
  • AI Policy, Policies, and Policing
  • Interstellar AI

Conferences

  • 2024. Teaching in the Age of AI
  • 2023. Writing in the Age of AI

Workshops
2024. Topics in AI and Education

Coverage

News

Podcasts

Workshop
2024. "Topics in AI and Education." UF Video. Various Scenes.

I teach pathbreaking courses in AI

Thanks to UF being the leader in AI education, I am able to offer transformative learning experiences that go beyond writing.

Beyond the critical or the creative and the human or the artificial, my AI courses empower students to find solutions to real issues and prepare them for what's next. Here are my courses.

IDH 3931
Interstellar AI

A UF "(Un)common Writes" Honors course focused on one of the most uncommon ways of writing: for the stars.

Course Description
Beyond the end of writing, our probes and transmissions will transit the stars. The symbolic rhetorics of our messages at once indicate the significance of communicative priorities and serve to mark by absence what could have been different. In other words, our messages must prioritize content to such a degree that what is not sent could also be significant. What if we could send new versions? On the Pioneer probes, we sent plaques etched with signs. On the Voyager probes, we sent golden records with sights and sounds. Thus, as technology progresses, our messages develop in sophistication. What would we send in the age of artificial intelligence? By interpreting messages we have already sent, analyzing their formation and genre, reading their history, and recreating them, we will come to fully appreciate the elements of scientific semiosis to prepare for the course project: crafting an AI-driven message.

ENC 3254
Professional Writing in AI

Preparation for the Careers of the Future

Course Description
The advantages of AI in research and industry are limitless. As developments in AI unfold, new programs, platforms, services, and applications will influence if not reshape entire sectors of the economy. Along the way, such AI-driven solutions will be prepared, packaged, and promoted with professional writing. Therefore, students pursuing courses and careers in AI should develop not only programming capacities but also skills in proposals, presentations, and visual rhetoric. To that end, this course will professionalize your writing in preparation for AI-related research and business opportunities.

IDS 2935
The Rhetoric of AI

How can we unlock the ability of AI to convince others?

Course Description
Just as the internet revolutionized the economy, so AI is reshaping potential in every sector from finance and automobiles to art and business to business sales. At the heart of AI capabilities or dreams rest human talents, among which number understanding, interpreting, imagining, making smart decisions, and conversing. On this last front, companies large and small, from blue chips to startups, are creating platforms and solutions that drive human-machine interaction by and through conversations. For every, “Okay, Google” or “Hey, Siri” to help us with tasks, there is the potential for “Help me understand something” and “Help me through something.” Thus, while we have the ability to give AI commands, conversational AI has the power to influence, persuade, and help us grow, all of which create equally interesting and alarming possibilities. Can AI be programmed to mimic personality qua identity? To the extent that rhetoric is the art of persuasion, can AI be programmed to effectively manipulate situations toward optimal events? In this Quest 1 course, we will examine these questions while testing our assumptions. By relying on multidisciplinary knowledge from anthropology, art, linguistics, philosophy, professional writing, psychology, rhetoric, and technical writing to develop interdisciplinary skills in creative and critical thinking, collaboration, presentations, public speaking, and research, our work in AI will necessarily bridge the humanities with the technical. To that end, we will begin with the history and theories of rhetoric and AI. Then, we will survey the landscape of AI developers and developments. Finally, we will program a conversational AI assistant to explore how rhetorical savvy can attach to AI potential. Along the way, we will use enterprise-grade platforms, pursue certifications for career-readiness, undertake projects to professionalize our writing, and develop professional workplace competencies. By the end of this course, students will be able to understand the history of rhetoric, discuss current articulations of AI, professionally craft technical content, favorably edit their work as well as the work of their peers, effectively demonstrate solutions and collaboratively marshal resources to support them, and master the strategies to successfully realize AI projects on Enterprise-grade platforms.

IDS 2935
AI Policy, Policies, and Policing

Examining Fairness and Reason behind University AI Policies

Course Description
AI programs, platforms, applications, and services have proliferated over the last two years. In that time, the national conversation—from classrooms to congress—about AI has intensified. Yet, the discourse about AI has tends toward dichotomy and dilemma. Indeed, the very concepts used to describe AI use tend toward encampment (e.g., a tool can be right or wrong). Since nebulous conceptualization moves us away from appreciating the complex realities and processes that underpin the work of AI, the way we imagine AI can lead to misunderstanding, and the downstream effects therefrom can have a devastating effect on students (e.g., students become subject to policies that limit potential or party to procedures that likewise imperil futures). Relatedly, universities, colleges, departments, and faculty are creating policies that embrace or exile AI. Missions, visions, values, and principles are being revised in light of new developments. In this course, we will study whether conceptualizations of AI and the policies built thereon are reasonably just. To that end, students will learn and apply theory, create and design multimodal content, and evaluate policies across higher education while grappling with our essential question: can AI policies be fair?

probe with solar system

Interact with the Probe

Please note that the chatbot is limited in scale and scope to the work of the students. Each student writes content for one topic.

2024 Fall Topics
Arts, DNA, Emotions, Ethics, and Community

Zea Miller

Teaching Statement
Research Statement
AI Statement
CV

Assistant Instructional Professor

University Writing Program
University of Florida
zea.miller@ufl.edu

Managing Editor

Journal of Writing and Artificial Intelligence
University of Florida


Production Editor

Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics
Center for Cognition and Neuroethics
University of Michigan-Flint
zeam@umich.edu

Connect

LinkedIn
Google Scholar