Since arriving at the University of Florida, I have been pioneering courses, leading international workshops, and hosting conferences on professional writing and AI. Convinced that how we consider AI has downstream implications for its use in the classroom, I launched the Journal of Writing and Artificial Intelligence to explore the future of writing. My philosophy of AI and education does not disentangle theoretical and practical fronts: conceptualization attaches to appropriate use.
The discourse surrounding AI in higher education suffers from two base complications. First, it is largely analogous (e.g., AI is the new calculator; or, it's like a microwave: good at certain things but bad at others), which, though helpful, gives rise to nebulous conceptualization and moves us away from appreciating structure and process. Second, and relatedly, the very concepts used to describe AI tend toward encampment (e.g., tools can be good or bad; or, uses can be right or wrong). While both issues lead and contribute to misunderstanding, the secondary effects therefrom can have a devastating effect on students (e.g., students become subject to policies that limit potential or party to procedures that likewise imperil futures). This need not be the case. Instead, we can conceptualize AI both in ways that attach to standards (e.g., inspiration, revision, transformation) and in ways that bypass dichotomies (e.g., situational procedures). Toward these ends, I hope to situate the conversation about AI in higher education semantically apart from its popular rhetoric by creating a new socio-cognitive grounding: AI as a model or mode for taking appropriate measures. Thus, conceptualization of AI need not be something but somehow.
In both academe and industry, AI-driven solutions are everywhere. Our obligation to prepare our students for the future must include AI. Students pursuing courses and careers in AI should develop not only capacities for programming and prompting LLMs but also skills in AI-based proposals, presentations, and visuals. Just as with computers, there will be more practitioners of AI than people innovating within AI programming. Thus, as a function of workforce readiness, we must prepare the next generation to communicate in spaces where AI-driven solutions are generated and conveyed. To these ends, I teach various writing for AI courses at UF—the AI University.
Editor
Journal of Writing and
Artificial
Intelligence
Courses
Conferences
Workshops
2024. Topics in AI and Education
News
Podcasts
Workshop
2024. "Topics in AI and Education."
UF Video. Various Scenes.
Beyond the critical or the creative and the human or the artificial, my AI courses empower students to find solutions to real issues and prepare them for what's next. Here are my courses.
Course Description
Beyond the end of writing, our probes and transmissions will transit the stars. The symbolic
rhetorics of our messages
at once indicate the significance of communicative priorities and serve to mark by absence what
could have been
different. In other words, our messages must prioritize content to such a degree that what is
not sent could also be
significant. What if we could send new versions? On the Pioneer probes, we sent plaques etched
with signs. On the
Voyager probes, we sent golden records with sights and sounds. Thus, as technology progresses,
our messages develop in
sophistication. What would we send in the age of artificial intelligence? By interpreting
messages we have already sent,
analyzing their formation and genre, reading their history, and recreating them, we will come to
fully appreciate the
elements of scientific semiosis to prepare for the course project: crafting an AI-driven
message.
Course Description
The advantages of AI in research and industry are limitless. As developments in AI unfold, new
programs, platforms,
services, and applications will influence if not reshape entire sectors of the economy. Along
the way, such AI-driven
solutions will be prepared, packaged, and promoted with professional writing. Therefore,
students pursuing courses and
careers in AI should develop not only programming capacities but also skills in proposals,
presentations, and visual
rhetoric. To that end, this course will professionalize your writing in preparation for
AI-related research and business
opportunities.
Course Description
Just as the internet revolutionized the economy, so AI is reshaping potential in every sector
from finance and
automobiles to art and business to business sales. At the heart of AI capabilities or dreams
rest human talents, among
which number understanding, interpreting, imagining, making smart decisions, and conversing. On
this last front,
companies large and small, from blue chips to startups, are creating platforms and solutions
that drive human-machine
interaction by and through conversations. For every, “Okay, Google” or “Hey, Siri” to help us
with tasks, there is the
potential for “Help me understand something” and “Help me through something.” Thus, while we
have the ability to give AI
commands, conversational AI has the power to influence, persuade, and help us grow, all of which
create equally
interesting and alarming possibilities. Can AI be programmed to mimic personality qua identity?
To the extent that
rhetoric is the art of persuasion, can AI be programmed to effectively manipulate situations
toward optimal events? In
this Quest 1 course, we will examine these questions while testing our assumptions. By relying
on multidisciplinary
knowledge from anthropology, art, linguistics, philosophy, professional writing, psychology,
rhetoric, and technical
writing to develop interdisciplinary skills in creative and critical thinking, collaboration,
presentations, public
speaking, and research, our work in AI will necessarily bridge the humanities with the
technical. To that end, we will
begin with the history and theories of rhetoric and AI. Then, we will survey the landscape of AI
developers and
developments. Finally, we will program a conversational AI assistant to explore how rhetorical
savvy can attach to AI
potential. Along the way, we will use enterprise-grade platforms, pursue certifications for
career-readiness, undertake
projects to professionalize our writing, and develop professional workplace competencies. By the
end of this course,
students will be able to understand the history of rhetoric, discuss current articulations of
AI, professionally craft
technical content, favorably edit their work as well as the work of their peers, effectively
demonstrate solutions and
collaboratively marshal resources to support them, and master the strategies to successfully
realize AI projects on
Enterprise-grade platforms.
Course Description
AI programs, platforms, applications, and services have proliferated over the last two years. In
that time, the national
conversation—from classrooms to congress—about AI has intensified. Yet, the discourse about AI
has tends toward
dichotomy and dilemma. Indeed, the very concepts used to describe AI use tend toward encampment
(e.g., a tool can be
right or wrong). Since nebulous conceptualization moves us away from appreciating the complex
realities and processes
that underpin the work of AI, the way we imagine AI can lead to misunderstanding, and the
downstream effects therefrom
can have a devastating effect on students (e.g., students become subject to policies that limit
potential or party to
procedures that likewise imperil futures). Relatedly, universities, colleges, departments, and
faculty are creating
policies that embrace or exile AI. Missions, visions, values, and principles are being revised
in light of new
developments. In this course, we will study whether conceptualizations of AI and the policies
built thereon are
reasonably just. To that end, students will learn and apply theory, create and design multimodal
content, and evaluate
policies across higher education while grappling with our essential question: can AI policies be
fair?
Please note that the chatbot is limited in scale and scope to the work of the students. Each student writes content for one topic.
2024 Fall Topics
Arts, DNA, Emotions, Ethics, and Community
University Writing Program
University of Florida
zea.miller@ufl.edu
Journal of Writing and Artificial Intelligence
University of Florida
Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics
Center for Cognition and Neuroethics
University of Michigan-Flint
zeam@umich.edu